Barrett食管伴滑动性食管裂孔疝腹腔镜治疗疗效观察

目的探究合并滑动性食管裂孔疝的Barrett食管患者经腹腔镜下治疗后生活质量和食管黏膜病变的改善情况。 方法回顾性收集首都医科大学宣武医院胃食管反流中心2016年1月至2020年12月诊断为Barrett食管伴滑动性食管裂孔疝患者23例，接受腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补+胃底折叠术，于术前和术后12周时行胃镜、胃食管反流病自测量表（Gerd Q）评分、反流症状指数（RSI）评分、健康调查量表36（SF-36）调查问卷，评估患者术后生活质量和食管黏膜改善情况。 结果23例伴滑动性食管裂孔疝的Barrett患者术后12周随访显示3例患者黏膜病变部分消退。患者术后GerdQ、RSI相较术前均有明显改善（GerdQ：5.78±1.54 vs 11.65±1.50，P=0.00；RSI：9.70±1.92 vs 18.57±3.01，P=0.00），SF-36量表仅在生理功能方面改善不明显（85.87±4.16 vs 86.43±3.12，P=0.31），生理职能、情感职能、活力、精神健康、社会功能、躯体疼痛和总体健康方面均明显改善（生理职能：66.43±6.13 vs 35.48±2.86，P=0.00；情感职能：73.74±4.91 vs 65.22±2.58，P=0.00；活力：56.96±3.80 vs 50.30±4.56，P=0.00；精神健康：62.09±4.89 vs 53.26±2.07，P=0.00；社会功能：81.39±4.42 vs 74.00±3.59，P=0.00；躯体疼痛：80.00±6.84 vs 75.30±10.27，P=0.00；总体健康：69.17±5.68 vs 60.17±4.61，P=0.00）。 结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补+胃底折叠术对伴滑动性食管裂孔疝的Barrett食管患者生活质量和黏膜病变均有一定改善。     

骨科围手术期患者静脉血栓栓塞症物理预防的最佳证据总结

目的总结骨科围手术期患者静脉血栓栓塞症（VTE）物理预防的证据，提高护理人员VTE物理预防措施实施依从性。方法根据澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心证据总结方法学，检索骨科围手术期患者VTE物理预防相关文献，根据纳入文献类型，由研究人员独立进行质量评价，并提取、汇总最佳证据。结果共纳入文献17篇，包含10篇指南、1篇证据总结、2篇专家共识、4篇系统评价。经过分析，总结出7类共30条骨科围手术期患者VTE物理预防最佳证据。结论最佳证据可为护士提供循证依据。但在应用时，还需评估具体临床情境，结合专业判断和患者意愿，针对性选择证据，以促进护理质量的持续改进。     

基于SF-36的学术期刊编辑生存质量初步调查及影响因素探析

【目的】 初步了解学术期刊编辑生存质量状况,并探析其可能的影响因素,为改善学术期刊编辑身心健康、促进期刊可持续发展提供参考。【方法】 基于SF-36健康调查量表,在问卷星网站创建《学术期刊编辑生存质量调查问卷》,并发送至多个期刊编辑QQ群和微信群,在线下载答卷后进行分析。【结果】 在SF-36量表的8个维度中,生理角色维度的得分最高,总体健康维度的得分最低,与常模一致;生理职能维度的得分高于常模,躯体疼痛和精神健康维度的得分低于常模。多因素分析结果表明,每周加班频次≥3次、男性、工作年限在0~<10年、无职务、未与家人同住,以及所在期刊未被《中文核心期刊要目总览(2017年版)》、中国科学引文数据库、《中国科技论文统计源期刊》中的任一种收录可能是编辑生存质量的关键影响因素。【结论】 学术期刊编辑生存质量状况总体与国内常模接近,男性、独居、编龄短、加班频次高、期刊未被任一国内核心数据库收录可能与学术期刊编辑生存质量相关。     

植物花青素对肿瘤抑制作用的研究进展

植物花青素是一类可溶于水的类黄酮,主要存在于各种蔬菜水果中。常见的植物花青素主要分为天竺葵色素(Pelargonidin)、芍药色素(Peonidin)、矢车菊色素(Cyanidin)、锦葵色素(Malvidin)、矮牵牛色素(Petunidin)、飞燕草色素(Delphinidin)六种;植物花青素分子中含有共轭双键体系,并含有碱性或酸性基团,因而具有抗氧化、抗炎、调节免疫、抗衰老和抑癌等生物学作用,尤其以抑癌作用最为突出。因此,本文将对植物花青素的抑癌作用及可能的机制进行综述。     

Correlation between cow’s milk protein allergy and otitis media: a systematic review

ObjectivesTo review the evidence pertaining to the association between cow’s milk protein allergy and recurrent acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion.MethodsThe CENTRAL, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, LILACS databases, and gray literature were searched.ResultsFour studies were included, identifying the prevalence rates: 0.2% of delayed speech due to chronic otitis media with effusion in 382 children with cow’s milk protein allergy, 10.7% of cow’s milk protein allergy in 242 children who underwent ENT procedures, 40% of cow’s milk protein allergy in 25 children with recurrent otitis media with effusion and higher tendency to otitis media in children with cow’s milk protein allergy of 186 children (1.5 + 0.6 vs. 0.4 + 0.1; p < 0.1).ConclusionConsidering the characteristics and methodological variations of the identified studies, it is not possible to state that there is reliable evidence of an association between cow’s milk protein allergy and otitis media.     

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion,A Misnomer?: Where Do We Go From Here?

The importance of the left atrial appendage (LAA) as the source of thromboembolism including stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is well documented, with more than 90% of ischemic strokes related to a LAA thrombus. Although oral anticoagulation has been the standard of care, approximately 50% to 60% of patients either have contraindications to oral anticoagulation or do not continue the medication beyond the first year. This led to the development of local site-specific therapy to occlude the LAA by either surgical or transcatheter means. Despite marked advancements, incomplete LAA closure with surgical and transcatheter approaches remains frequent. The etiology of incomplete LAA closure and its clinical implications remain unclear. Multiple strategies are in development including changes in deployment techniques, a new device design, and alternative approaches to leak closure.     

Collaborating toward equity in Pennsylvania: The Age-Friendly Care,PA project

Objective

To collaboratively implement the age-friendly health systems framework, known as the 4Ms: What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility, at The Primary Health Network (PHN), a federally qualified health center.

Data Sources

Data were collected from PHN electronic medical records (EMRs) for individuals over age 65 from December 30, 2019 to December 24, 2021 and from Project ECHO© attendance and evaluation surveys.

Study Design

The telementoring educational program, Project ECHO©, was used to engage PHN health care professionals working in rural areas of Pennsylvania to incorporate the 4Ms into their practice starting with the annual wellness visit (AWV). Project ECHO© was launched at three primary care sites. After 18 months, it was then disseminated to an additional 18 sites creating pilot and comparison groups. Outcomes included codesigned patient process metrics using EMR data and project ECHO© participant data.

Data Collection Methods

EMR data were generated by system reports created by PHN's quality assurance program manager. Project ECHO© data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools. Outcomes were aggregated, analyzed for trends over time, and compared between groups.

Principal Findings

All nine process outcomes increased from baseline to follow-up at the three initial sites, ranging from 4% to 43% g. At year two, the three initial sites had higher rates on AWVs (pilot 24%, comparison 12%; p < 0.0001), Advance Care Planning (New on file, pilot 8%, comparison 2%; Discussed with patient, pilot 18%, comparison 13%; Patient declined, pilot 0%, comparison 0%; p = 0.0001), Dementia Screening (pilot 24%, comparison 12%; p < 0.0001), Fall Risk Management (pilot 43%, comparison 10%; p < 0.0001), and Mobility Goal (pilot 19%, comparison 9%; p < 0.0001); and lower rates on High-Risk Medication Elimination (pilot 54%, comparison, 63%, p < 0.02).

Conclusions

Access to high-quality geriatric care for rural older adults can be improved by increasing health care professionals' knowledge of the 4Ms, beginning with its incorporation into the AWV.     

Comparison between standard Vs. Escalated dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A two centers,observational study

IntroductionThe risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 was found to be significantly higher in patients who experienced thromboembolic events. Thus, several guidelines recommend using prophylactic anticoagulants in all COVID-19 hospitalized patients. However, there is uncertainty about the appropriate dosing regimen and safety of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, this study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of standard versus escalated dose pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.MethodsA two-center retrospective cohort study including critically ill patients aged ≥ 18-years with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from March 1st, 2020, until January 31st, 2021. Patients who received either Enoxaparin 40 mg daily or Unfractionated heparin 5000 Units three times daily were grouped under the “standard dose VTE prophylaxis and patients who received higher than the standard dose but not as treatment dose were grouped under ”escalated VTE prophylaxis dose“. The primary outcome was the occurance of thrombotic events, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, mortality, and other ICU-related complications.ResultsA total of 758 patients were screened; 565 patients were included in the study. We matched 352 patients using propensity score matching (1:1). In patients who received escalated dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, any case of thrombosis and VTE were similar between the two groups (OR 1.22;95 %CI 0.52–2.86; P = 0.64 and OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.16–3.38; P = 0.70 respectively). However, the odds of minor bleeding was higher in patients who received escalated VTE prophylaxis dose (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.08–10.61; P = 0.04). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality nor in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HR 1.17;95 %CI0.79–1.73; P = 0.43 and HR 1.08;95 %CI 0.76–1.53; P = 0.83, respectively).ConclusionEscalated-dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with thrombosis, or mortality benefits but led to an increased risk of minor bleeding. This study supports previous evidence regarding the optimal dosing VTE pharmacological prophylaxis regimen for critically ill patients with COVID-19.